We are upgrading your website experience! Click here for more information.
Core Concepts
Scientific Fundamentals Explained

CRISPR and Cas9 for Flexible Genome Editing

CRISPR RNAs Make Targeted Gene Editing Easy

CRISPRs (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) are sequences found naturally in bacteria and archaea that are part of an adaptive defense mechanism. CRISPRs, in conjunction with CRISPR associated (Cas) proteins, are able to recognize and cleave complementary DNA sequences, protecting the cells from foreign sequences [1].

Following the discovery of CRISPRs, it was shown that the S. pyogenes Cas9 nuclease could be directed to cleave specific DNA sequences when used in conjunction with a small CRISPR associated RNA (crRNA) and a separate transactivating RNA (tracRNA). The crRNA contains a target-specific protospacer of 20–40 bases, and a repeat motif that is recognized and bound by the tracRNA. The crRNA is processed so that the protospacer recognizes 20 bases of the target sequence, which must also contain a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) [2]. When the crRNA and tracRNA come together, Cas9 is able to bind and cleave DNA sequences complementary to the protospacer [2].

Figure 1 shows how the CRISPR/Cas9 system can be used to create a double-strand break (DSB) at a sequence-specific target site. More recently, it has been shown that Cas9 can be targeted to desired gene locations in a variety of organisms, from E. coli to humans, with a chimeric single-guide RNA (sgRNA) that contains both the crRNA and tracRNA elements [3,4].

 Figure 1.  Examples of CRISPR/Cas9 Designs Using gBlocks® Gene Fragments. The tracRNA and crRNA required to guide Cas9 to a target sequence can be combined into a chimeric sgRNA (yellow). The sgRNA, including a U6 promoter, can be ordered as a single gBlocks Gene Fragment. The ~4.1 kb, S. pyogenes Cas9 sequence can be codon-optimized and assembled from 6–7 gBlocks Gene Fragments, depending on design (green). Single plasmid, plasmid-Cas9 + gBlocks sgRNA, and in vitro RNA translation are some of the methods used to introduce CRISPR/Cas9 elements into cells. Cas9 creates a double-stranded break (DSB) 3 bases from the NGG sequence that makes up the PAM site of S. pyogenes. Note that the PAM site is not included in the sgRNA, but must be present in the target. DSB repair will produce a deletion by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) in most cases. Mutations or insertions can be created by homologous repair (HR), by adding a donor sequence that has homologous overlaps to the DSB site—typically 100–1000 bp of overlap is used.

In most eukaryotic cells, the DSB created by Cas9 is repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), which results in small deletions or insertions that disrupt genes where the break occurred. This mechanism can be used to achieve gene silencing at the genome level. Alternatively, in some cells, and in presence of donor DNA that contains homologous overlaps with DNA on either side of the DSB, endogenous DNA repair mechanisms can integrate “foreign” DNA into the cell’s genome by homologous recombination. The ability to introduce foreign sequences at specific genomic loci can be used to obtain targeted changes to genes or add genes or molecular pathways to genomes by incorporating synthetic sequences [4,5].

Most importantly, the CRISPR/Cas9 system is relatively easy to implement compared to other editing approaches as a means to create either targeted gene disruptions in a variety of organisms and cell types, or to insert sequence changes to targeted genomic regions [3].

Improving the Accuracy of Cas9

One of the reported limitations of the CRISPR/Cas9 system is that it can also recognize sequences with up to 5 mismatched bases, especially at the 5′ end of the target sequence. This means that off-target effects may occur at a rate higher than other methods of genome editing [5,6,7].

A potential solution to increase specificity of CRISPR induced changes has recently been demonstrated independently by the labs of Dr George Church at Harvard University and Dr Feng Zhang at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. By altering the amino acid sequence at 1 of the 2 catalytic sites within Cas9, they have created Cas9 mutants that nick only 1 strand of DNA per sgRNA target. Using this Cas9 “nickase”, DSBs can only be made by creating 2 targeting CRISPR complexes with 2 independent sgRNAs. Each sgRNA is designed to recognize a sequence in close proximity to the other, one targeting the sense and the other the antisense strand of the desired genome location. The dual specificity of this method is thought to greatly reduce the off-target effects [8,9]. Other yet to be identified Cas9 improvements, or enzymes from sources other than S. pyogenes may further improve the overall efficacy and/or specificity of the system.

Advancing CRISPR Research With gBlocks® Gene Fragments

Several recent papers have taken advantage of the sequence and application flexibility of IDT gBlocks Gene Fragments to explore CRISPR and Cas9 function. The custom-made, synthetic gBlocks Gene Fragments have been used to create codon-optimized versions of Cas9, constructed for efficient expression in various host cells [4,5,10]. It is also simple to make variants, such as the Cas9 nickases described by the Church and Zhang labs, or to add motifs like nuclear localization signals that direct translated Cas9 enzyme into the nucleus for genome targeting.

Along with the various Cas9 constructs, chimeric sgRNAs also need to be generated. Typical sgRNA designs are ~150 bp in length, and a complete design that includes a human U6 promoter can be made with ~450 bp of DNA sequence, which means these can be easily ordered as a single gBlocks Gene Fragment, making them ideal for generating synthetic sgRNAs quickly and inexpensively [4,8,10]. The sgRNA constructs and promoter can then be cloned into an expression vector, introduced directly into cells, or in vitro transcribed into RNA. Figure 1 illustrates some popular CRISPR/Cas9 designs that can be generated using gBlocks Gene Fragments.

Including the Cas9 and sgRNA on the same plasmid simplifies the experimental procedure, while keeping the sgRNA and Cas9 separate has the advantage of allowing tight dosage control of these individual components. Choosing the correct construction method for your experiments will depend on the specific aims of your research design. In addition to controlling dosage, the duration of the Cas9 and sgRNA can be regulated by using in vitro transcribed RNA for transfer into cells. While DNA is relatively stable when transfected or injected into cells, transcribed RNA is quickly degraded, meaning that the CRISPR/Cas9 elements will be short-lived. Their short lifespan ensures that the artificial constructs will not be incorporated into genomic DNA and passed on to daughter cells [11].

Additional research demonstrating CRISPR/Cas9 designs can be found by clicking on the Citations link at www.idtdna.com/gBlocks.

IDT Product Focus

gBlocks® Gene Fragments are double-stranded, sequence-verified genomic blocks 125 to 750 bp in length that can be shipped in 2–4 working days for affordable and easy gene construction or modification. gBlocks Gene Fragments are synthesized using the same industry-leading, high-fidelity synthesis chemistries developed by IDT for Ultramer® oligonucleotides, and are sequence verified prior to shipping.  

Learn more about gBlocks Gene Fragments

Author: Hans Packer, PhD, is a Scientific Writer at IDT.


    1. Makarova KS, Grishin NV, et al. (2006) A putative RNA-interference-based immune system in prokaryotes: computational analysis of the predicted enzymatic machinery, functional analogies with eukaryotic RNAi, and hypothetical mechanisms of action. Biol Direct, 1(7).
    2. Jinek M, Chylinski K, et al. (2012) A programmable dual-RNA–guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 337(6096): 816–821.
    3. Mussolino C, Cathomen T. (2013) RNA guides genome engineering. Nat Biotechnol, 31(3):208–209.
    4. Cong L, Ran FA, et al. (2013) Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science, 339(6121):819–23.
    5. Mali P, Yang L, et al. (2013) RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science, 336(6121):823–826.
    6. Pattanayak V, Lin S, et al. (2013) High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat Biotechnol, 31(9):839–843.
    7. Hsu PD, Scott DA, et al (2013) DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol, 31(9):827–832.
    8. Mali P, Aach J, et al. (2013) CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering. Nat Biotechnol, 31(9):833–838.
    9. Ran FA, Hsu PD, et al. (2013) Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell, 154(6):1380–1389.
    10. Dickinson DJ, Ward JD, et al. (2013) Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using Cas9-triggered homologous recombination. Nat Methods, 10(10):1028–1034.
    11. Yang H, Haoyi W, et al. (2013) One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell, 6(154):1370–1379.