Your product is now available from Integrated DNA Technologies.
Many of the Swift products you have grown to love are now part of our new complete portfolio, xGen™ NGS. Through this new partnership we are pleased to offer you comprehensive next generation sequencing solutions.
xGen NGS—made for you.
Unsure of what products are available? Or, perhaps you’d like guidance on which products are compatible? If so, try our xGen NGS Solutions Builder Tool today.
Our Scientific Applications Support team has assembled a list of frequently asked questions to help you find answers quickly. Filter using one or more categories to focus on specific topics, or use the search bar to perform a text search.
My CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing efficiency seems very low. How can I improve my experiments?
Possible reasons for low editing efficiency
Depending on your method of assessment, your editing efficiency may be underrepresented. Mismatch endonucleases like T7EI do not detect single base changes, and under-estimate actual editing compared to direct sequencing.
Not every sequence associated with a PAM site performs the same. For example, polymorphisms in the protospacer binding site may reduce editing efficiency. Base mismatches also become more detrimental to editing the closer they are to the PAM site.
Try 2 or 3 different PAM sites in your gene of interest to identify a site that provides optimal editing efficiency.
Include control experiments to help monitor or optimize CRISPR reagent delivery. Alt-R® CRISPR-Cas9 HPRT Positive Control cRNAs and Alt-R CRISPR-Cas9 Negative Control cRNAs are available for human, mouse, and rat.
If you are using electroporation methods, including Alt-R Cas9 Electroporation Enhancer could improve transfection efficiency and, therefore, editing efficiency.
Please contact us at email@example.com for additional assistance; having the results of your control experiments available will facilitate our ability to help you.