We occasionally get calls from researchers who take issue with the yield readings we supply, saying they differ from what the researcher has calculated after resuspension. This article highlights the importance of finding the [right] molar extinction coefficient in calculations of oligonucleotide concentration.
Why include extinction coefficient in calculations?
Optical absorbance at 260 nm is routinely used to measure the concentration of nucleic acids present in a solution. Approximate conversion factors estimate that duplex DNA is about 50 μg/OD260, single-stranded RNA is approximately 40 μg/OD260, and single-stranded DNA is approximately 33 μg/OD260.
While these conversion factors may provide a reasonable estimate for long, essentially randomized sequences, they are less accurate for short oligonucleotides and repeating sequences. Conjugated double bonds are strong absorbers of light. They exhibit a property known as resonance, which causes them to absorb light of longer wavelengths (i.e., low energy). The molar absorptivity or extinction coefficient, and wavelength of maximum absorbance generally increase with increasing numbers of conjugated double bonds. Thus, the absorbance of each base is different, and base composition, sequence context, and sequence length all influence absorbance. In laymen’s terms, the extinction coefficient of a material describes the amount of light absorbed at a given concentration and distance travelled.
By how much does sequence composition affect extinction coefficient?
Would you believe that the extinction coefficient for a sequence as short as 6 bases can vary just by arranging the bases in a different order? Additionally, base composition can lead to significant differences in the extinction coefficient. See Table 1 for examples.
Greatest accuracy is therefore achieved when the exact value of ε260 is calculated for each oligo. Further, it is necessary to take into account the presence of oligo modifications, such as fluorescent dyes, which may have significant absorbance at 260 nm.
For these reasons, IDT calculates the extinction coefficient for every oligo synthesized using a nearest neighbor method. This value is then used to measure the yield for each oligonucleotide produced.
The nearest neighbor method
Nearest neighbor values for ε260 of dNTPs are:
We then use the formula [2,3],
Absorbance is calculated using the Beer-Lambert Law:
A = log(Io/I) = ε × c × p
where, A is absorbance; Io and I are, respectively, the intensities of incident and transmitted light; c is the molar concentration of an oligonucleotide (mole/L); p is the length of the light path through the sample (cm); and ε is the molecule molar extinction coefficient (L/mole•cm).
Is there a program that can do dna extinction coefficient calculation for me?
The nearest neighbor calculation of extinction coefficient for any sequence can be calculated using IDT's free IDT OligoAnalyzer® program (www.idtdna.com/SciTools), which will then go on to determine OD for that sequence (Figure 1).
Additional recommendations for extinction coefficient calculation
Know the limitations of your instrumentation. Most labs use inexpensive spectrophotometers that are focused on accessibility and ease of use. These advantages are important but sometimes come at the expense of measurement accuracy. Know the linear detection range of your instrument and stay within that range. Additionally, like all pieces of equipment, spectrophotometers may age or drift so it is important to monitor their performance over time. All IDT instruments are measured against NIST traceable standards  at regular intervals.
Thorough mixing is important. For an accurate assessment of quantity it is essential that the material sampled be representative of the entire sample. Be sure to mix the sample to homogeneity to avoid under or over estimations of quantity. This is important not only during resuspension, but before all critical absorbance measurements. Concentration gradients may develop due to freeze/ thaw cycles, for example.
Volume delivery during sample preparation is important. While sample volume accuracy may not be critical for all instruments, it is for cuvette-based spectrophotometers. Generally speaking, the greater the transfer volume, the more accurate and precise transfer will be. So, it is best to use highest transfer volume possible. This is especially true for pipettes. Use them at or near their nominal volume; i.e., perform 20 μL transfers using a 20 μL pipette and not a 100 μL pipette. Even though both pipettes can make the transfer, the 20 μL pipette will transfer the volume more accurately and precisely.